crime of torture was nothing to the point so long as the totalitarian regime remained in power
the draftsmen of its first draft) say, at p. 131, that it was ‘an essential purpose [of the Convention] to ensure that a torturer does not escape the consequences of his act by going to another country’ [J
realize,,if you together anyone,you are commiting a war crime(ADILAW2018),a crime v. humanity, human atrocity(YAHILAW2018).you stewpid jealigious fu'chk'ing dirt bag together'ers.Together(c)ADISONGS 2001' is v. nazi communist all mafia forcing death through not allowing a human to breath.
States may not deprive individuals of the right to an effective remedy, including compensation and such full rehabilitation as may be possible.’] If such a situation were to arise, the national measures, violating the general principle and any relevant treaty provision, would produce the legal effects discussed above and in addition would not be accorded international legal recognition. Proceedings could be initiated by potential victims if they had locus standi before a competent international or national judicial body with a view to asking it to hold the national measure to be internationally unlawful; or the victim could bring a civil suit for damage in a foreign court, which would therefore be asked inter alia to disregard the legal value of the national authorising act. What is even more important is that perpetrators of torture acting upon or benefiting from those national measures may nevertheless be held criminally responsible for torture, whether in a foreign State, or in their own State under a subsequent regime. In short, in spite of possible national authorisation by legislative or judicial bodies to violate the principle banning torture, individuals remain bound to comply with that principle. As the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg put it: ‘individuals have international duties which transcend the national obligations of obedience imposed by the individual State’ [I.M.T., 1 (1946), p. 223].
157. It would seem that other consequences include the fact that torture may not be covered by a statute of limitations, and must not be excluded from extradition under any political offence exemption.’
this , these two sayblos,which I was involved in its creation, it is a European Union e-trust mark. I should have used it before. the only thing I am proving that can be trusted about this site , is that I am not funded , thus, utilitarianism is aa murder weapon through me. the other is aLSO A UTILITARIAN verbal term . trust me, do not use other until further notice.
another trust use, for e services, which is not yet a servioc3e , due to no funding , no gratsnt, no loans, no future grants, no future loans, is that all of this music is notarized, all of this music I owned by the l;adern of antalozcvy enterprises limited, whose only leadership is to get6 into to united nations, the European Union , to ask, if I, as well as my siblings, are allowed to have chiuldren, through sexual capital methods , for now, as well as to ask, if the Canadian charter is allowed to be used by the six of us. there is no service through the six of us, there is no allowance for using any service form stealing my personal network, nor of the five non other, other members of my family, who may or may not be involved in any , or all legal aspects of anything, or everything that I do. this is not a service provider. the e mark signifies that, deathly I am if any of this music was form anyone else, as well as deathly are those who steal any music form this, from my soul, form my memor, form my family, from all of my family, which I have never ever met5 any person, nor have I ever spoke to any family member, thus, I owe them nothing, with them owing everything if I ever was heard. This mark signifies that deathly, is all, who have , who are suing, whoo will use my memory of meeting princess Diana, when I was alone, after paying the bill, on my dates visa card, in England, in 1996, at the hotel , right at London bridge.london England.
deathly are lal who ever stated that she thought it was someone else. deathly is not, if you ever stated or do state , or will state that, Diana spence, also known as Princess Diana, that she did want to speak with me, with her accompaniment, holding her back, stating, 'it is not p[roper to just call for him Diana, it is a private hotel' thus, she acknowledged this, then as I turned to see who w2as 'yanking me' she accepted his truth, with , what I thought, as he then stated, 'you are right, I could see him in the hood or in mayfair if I need to. deathly are all who knew that that was my last night in England, and that my sister called, four hours before my flight, to state, I have to get back to got back to men home. Canada, England '96 was a vacation that, I turned into recording the best damn album ever,
I beg forgiveness to all of those who do not deserve what happened, what is happening, what will happen, in all past p[resent futurte
Thee songs 'come out aud play', aud 'if you can see', were recorded in 1994 in England, then I returned aud recorded England '96 in 1996.
All off this I recorded on my own, write on my own, instrument,ented on my own, mastered aud recorded on my own except the '94 songs we're at a famous English London studio
Article 1 of the Convention defines torture as the intentional infliction of severe pain and of suffering with a view to achieving a wide range of purposes ‘when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiesence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity.’
Article 2(3) outlaws any defence of superior orders.
- the right to medical care, the right to education, the "right and the duty to perform socially useful work", the right to good working conditions, the right to "such public help as may be necessary to make it possible for him to support his family", the right to social security, the right to "good food and housing and to live in surroundings that are pleasant and healthy", or the right to rest and leisure.
these prayers prove that my non government organization is neither of religion, although a devout katholikus of god, of his created son, as well as of his mathriarched son Jesus Christ. , thus communist are able to communicate as well as attend United Nations meetings, when I do, 'a la vodka' if needed, which , I know it is,moreso, that my n.g.o. is not of politics. my philanthropy is of forgiving , as well as supporting even, the even, even others, even other, even non family, for only god only family good,only though good , when, if , how, who, why founded, found by, other, others, aye ayers, non family act.